We provide strategic legal representation in international human rights matters, with a strong focus on litigation before domestic courts and international bodies in Türkiye and the United States. Our practice centers on rights-based advocacy designed to address systemic violations and to protect vulnerable individuals and families, particularly in matters involving migration, cross-border mobility, and state responsibility.
We represent clients in complex human rights proceedings before national courts in Türkiye and the U.S., as well as before international mechanisms, including applications to the European Court of Human Rights and individual complaints before United Nations human rights bodies. Our work is grounded in international treaties, comparative jurisprudence, and carefully developed litigation strategies aimed at securing effective remedies and long-term protection.
Across all matters, we approach human rights advocacy with legal rigor, discretion, and a deep understanding of the interaction between domestic legal systems and international human rights obligations, advancing accountability, due process, and the protection of human dignity.
We represent individuals and families in applications before the European Court of Human Rights concerning violations of rights guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights. Our team has substantial experience in ECHR litigation, particularly in cases arising from migration control, unlawful detention, deportation and removal measures, family life, fair trial violations, and the lack of effective domestic remedies.
The Court applies a highly rigorous admissibility review, and a significant portion of applications are declared inadmissible at the preliminary stage due to procedural deficiencies or insufficient legal substantiation. Moreover, the Court’s jurisprudence is continuously evolving, requiring close attention to recent case law, shifting standards, and emerging interpretative trends. Our approach is therefore grounded in meticulous admissibility analysis, strict procedural compliance, and precise legal framing that reflects both established principles and the Court’s ever-evolving jurisprudence. We manage the process from application drafting and interim measures to written submissions and post-judgment follow-up, with the objective of securing effective remedies and long-term protection.
We advise and represent clients in individual applications before the Constitutional Court of Türkiye for violations of fundamental rights protected under the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. Our practice is supported by an experienced litigation team with in-depth knowledge of constitutional procedure and the individual application system, particularly in cases involving administrative action, criminal proceedings, migration enforcement, and interference with private and family life.
The Constitutional Court conducts a strict and highly technical admissibility review, and a considerable number of applications are dismissed as manifestly ill-founded or inadmissible at an early stage. At the same time, the Court’s constitutional jurisprudence continues to evolve, often in close dialogue with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. We therefore place strong emphasis on admissibility strategy, exhaustion of domestic remedies, and the clear articulation of constitutional violations, supported by up-to-date and carefully selected jurisprudence. Where appropriate, we coordinate constitutional litigation with potential or pending international applications to ensure a coherent and forward-looking human rights strategy.